It is installed

What this is, and how to use it.

You have an assistant that lives in a folder on your computer. Point it at one and that folder becomes its world: it reads everything in there without you attaching anything, changes what you ask it to change, and uses the programs already on your machine.

Everything below is what you can now do with that. Ten minutes of reading, and none of it is technical.

The one idea underneath all of it

The folder is the whole mechanism.

Point it at one project

It knows that project properly. Every file, every version, every note. Ask it anything about that work and the context is already there: you never explain the background twice.

That is also the limit

It knows what is in the folder and nothing else. Start it somewhere else and it knows nothing about this. Where you start it is the single most consequential thing you decide.

1 · The everyday use

Type what you want done.

About files already on your computer. No uploading, no attaching, no particular format, no preparation.

Read every PDF in this folder and tell me which ones mention a termination clause.
Rename these four hundred photos by the date they were taken.
Pull the numbers out of these sixty invoices into one spreadsheet.
Compare these two versions and list only what changed in substance, not formatting.
Turn this hour of notes into who owes what, by when.
Sort this folder: just make it make sense, and tell me the rule you used.
Find every file I touched last week and remind me what I was doing.
Explain what this file is. I inherited it and nobody knows.

A minute each, roughly. If it needs something to do the job properly it will ask: but if you are vague it guesses confidently rather than stopping, so on anything that matters, add the sentence “show me first.”

2 · What makes it yours

Tell it something once. It keeps it.

Anything you explain can be written down where it gets read at the start of every session, forever. This is the difference between a chat window and a setup that knows your work.

Your voice and format

Show it thirty things you have written and tell it to learn the pattern. Drafts come back sounding like you rather than like software.

Your rules

“Never touch the signed folder.” “Never send anything without showing me.” Held mechanically, not as a polite note it might forget.

Your context

Your clients, projects, conventions and standards. It stops asking and starts already knowing.

Your definition of finished

Not just how to do the job but when it is done. It runs those checks on its own work before showing you.

Your decisions

A running record of what you chose and why. Six months later, ask “why did we do it this way” and get the real answer.

Your own shortcuts

The five-paragraph instruction you keep retyping becomes one word you define once.

The effect compounds. What you have in month three is noticeably better than week one and you never sat down to improve it: you just kept telling it things.

3 · The part most people miss

It can work while you are gone.

It does not need you watching. Describe a job and it runs on a schedule, or on a trigger, and the result is waiting when you come back.

On a schedule

The thing you do every Monday. It runs once while you watch so you can correct it, then does it weekly unasked.

On a trigger

Anything landing in a folder gets read, renamed, filed and logged before you have closed the window.

Overnight

Hand it four hours of grinding work at six in the evening. It is done in the morning.

4 · Several at once

You can run a team of them.

An agent is a second copy of the same assistant with its own job. It gets a written brief from you and starts completely blank: it cannot see your conversation or your screen. It does the work somewhere else and reports back one answer.

You brief one coordinator; it splits the work, sends out several at the same moment, and assembles what comes back. You have one conversation while five happen.

You one sentence The coordinator plans · splits · briefs · assembles Research own brief · blank slate Draft own brief · blank slate Check own brief · blank slate they cannot see each other, or you

Use it when the job has separate lanes

Several things to read, check or gather at once. On the right job it is the biggest jump available here. On the wrong one it is an expensive way to get four confident answers to a question you asked badly.

Two things to know

You cannot correct one mid-flight: it cannot see you, so the brief is your only steering. And reading in parallel is safe while writing in parallel is not: fan out to gather, come back to one to change anything.

5 · How far it goes

The same thing, at a much larger size.

Nothing below is a different product. It is the same window and the same sentences, pointed at something bigger: and this is the honest upper end of what it is used for.

Software, which is where it started

It was built to write and maintain code and that remains the deepest thing it does. If you are not technical, the relevant part is that it can build you the small tool nobody will ever sell you: the niche thing only forty people need. You describe it, and you own it afterwards.

A whole back office

Invoicing, chasing, filing, reconciling, reporting, the follow-ups you forget. Not one task automated, but the connective tissue between all of them.

An archive nobody has read in years

Two decades of documents, correspondence and contracts, answered across the whole body at once. That has never been affordable before.

A book, a film, any long piece of work

Continuity across hundreds of thousands of words or hundreds of hours of footage. What was established in chapter four. Which take you preferred and why.

Other software on your machine

It can drive the programs already installed. The ceiling is not what it can do alone: it is what everything on your computer can do, operated by sentences.

Your other accounts

Email, documents, calendar, storage, notes. With your permission it reads them and acts in them from the same conversation, so a question spanning three systems is one question.

The other half of the picture

Where it is genuinely bad.

None of these are obvious from ten minutes of using it, and all of them are worth knowing before you hand it something that matters.

It sounds equally sure when it is wrong

The tone never changes. Confidence is not a signal: on anything consequential, ask it to show you where each claim came from. It can, and that is the check that works.

It cannot know what you never wrote down

Everything in your head about how you work is invisible until it is in a file. Most disappointing results trace back to this rather than to the tool.

It has no taste

It can tell you a document is inconsistent. It cannot tell you whether the deal is good, or whether you should send it.

Arithmetic in its head is unreliable

For anything numeric, tell it to write and run an actual calculation rather than reasoning the total out. Then it is exact.

It fills gaps rather than leaving them

Unless told otherwise it may produce a plausible detail where it should have said “this is missing.” Ask it to flag gaps and it will.

Big jobs take real time

Reading four hundred documents properly takes minutes, not seconds. It is unattended, not instant, and those two get confused constantly.

6 · The one trade worth understanding

It can have all of it, if you want.

One folder is where you start, not where it stops. It can have every folder you own, your email, your documents, your calendar, your storage. That is genuinely how good it gets: the work you never do because gathering it takes longer than the answer is worth starts getting done.

Say this plainly

The more you give it, the more convenient it gets and the more inherent risk you take on. Those two move together and they always will. Anyone telling you otherwise is selling something.

So widen it deliberately rather than all at once. Start on one real project; give it more when you find yourself wishing it could see something else. Every change stays reversible, the guards refuse destructive work at any width, and you can tell it to ask before it acts: permanently, or just while you decide whether you trust it.

Widening is a decision you make on purpose, in a minute, and can walk back just as fast.